Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: st: RE: RE: estimation with a time trend.


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   AW: st: RE: RE: estimation with a time trend.
Date   Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:22:52 +0200

<> 

The coeff for "t" will stay the same, then, no matter how you "center" it:

*************
use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r11/nlswork, clear
egen t=group(year)
xtreg  ln_wage wks_work tenure south nev_mar age t, fe vce(robust)
replace t=t-7
xtreg  ln_wage wks_work tenure south nev_mar age t, fe vce(robust)
replace t=t-3
xtreg  ln_wage wks_work tenure south nev_mar age t, fe vce(robust)
*************



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von natasha agarwal
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Juli 2010 15:06
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: RE: RE: estimation with a time trend.

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your original question was
>
> "I was trying to estimate a production function with an unbalanced
> firm-year panel data and wanted to include a time trend. However I was
> not sure if the time trend was created correctly.
>
> egen t=group(year)
>
> I was wondering if anyone could please tell me if this was correct?"
>
> Who knows whether the commands you are using "mean center" the data if
> you do not tell us what they are?

I am sorry about this.

I issue the following line of commands:

egen t=group(year)
xtreg lnrval lnk lnw lnvfdi t, fe vce(robust)

Thanks
Natasha





> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> natasha agarwal
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Maarten buis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> --- On Mon, 5/7/10, natasha agarwal wrote:
>>> I am afraid I did not understand "year- (or -year-
>>> MINUS> midpoint) for interpretability?"
>>
>> Say you have a variable representing year of birth
>> ranging between 1910 and 1980. I would then usually
>> have a line like this in my do-file:
>>
>> gen c_year = year - 1910
>>
>> Afterwards I would use c_year instead of year. In
>> this case "midpoint" is 1910, and makes sure that
>> your new variable is shifted to the left such that
>> it has the value zero in 1910. This makes sure
>> that the baseline in your models refer to a point
>> at the beginning of your observed period. This is
>> particularly important if you include interactions
>> or if you care about the constant (e.g. in a random
>> effects model)
>
> I am estimating the model with a within estimator. I thought that they
> mean center the data anyways?
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index