Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: backed up
From
sun samn <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: backed up
Date
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:00:50 +0800
Good point. I never thought of the concave problem before. But my question is about GMM-to minimize a quadratic form, the concave is not a problem, is it?
thanks!
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:42:46 -0500
> Subject: Re: st: backed up
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, sun samn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your response. What do you mean by 'iterations being concave'? I did encounter another situation--the same number kept being iterated but cannot converge.
>
> The objective function you maximize must be concave.
>
> --
> Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
> Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/