Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: xttrans accuracy
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: xttrans accuracy
Date
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:48:59 +0200
<>
Which -matrix- are we talking about, Dmitriy? -xttrans- only leaves
-scalar-s behind, as far as I can see:
***********
webuse nlswork, clear
xtset id year
xttrans msp
ret li
xttab msp
mat l r(results)
***********
Maybe you want the returned -matrix- following -xttab-? Which results in
there are you unhappy about?
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dmitriy
Krichevskiy
Sent: Dienstag, 22. Juni 2010 22:08
To: statalist
Subject: st: xttrans accuracy
Dear Statalisters,
I am trying to calculate limiting distribution based on the matrix
produced by -xttans- . the issue is that -xttrans- produces (or sat
least shows) rounded results (such that often probability adds up to
.9999 and not 1) which complicates solving the system of equations. I
feel uncomfortable adding/subtracting arbitrary .01's here and there
to make things work, Is there a way to produce more accurate estimate
via -xttrans- or otherwise?
--
Dmitriy Krichevskiy Ph.D. Candidate
Economics Department
Florida International University
www.fiu.edu/~dkrichev
Research Associate, College of Education
Lumina Foundation Project
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/