Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: RE: A modest proposal - missing data doesn't count |
Date | Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:22:43 -0500 |
On Jun 14, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Nick Cox wrote:
-inrange()- is a well-defined function available for comparisons.
On Jun 14, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Martin Weiss wrote:
I got used to the -!mi()- thing in "bigger-than" comparisons after a couple of errors in this area, and I do not even regard it as a hassle anymore. What is all the fuss about?
Personally, I use both of these, depending on the context. If, say, I want to generate an indicator variable for when y takes (non-missing) values larger than 10, then I typically use
gen byte x = (10 < y) if !mi(y)which makes it clear that I am defining a variable which is missing if y is missing. Alternatively, if I want to map the non-missing values of y into some other variable, I use
recode y min/10=1 11/50=2 51/max=3, gen(x) or, if I just want to refer to a specific range of values, if inrange(y,51,maxdouble()) -- Phil * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/