Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Dominic Soon <dominic.soon.etc@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Structural Break Type Test with Fixed Effects IV and GMM |

Date |
Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:12:26 +0800 |

Yes, my mistake! I'm intending to use three approaches, from -xtreg- , -xtivreg- and -xtabond- (i.e. dynamic panel) Unfortunately, I don't have any other instrumental variables, let alone instrumental variables which impact S "differentially" in the early and the late period. In these circumstances, would the following make sense? SxL refers to S*L. xtreg Y L S SxL, fe xtivreg Y L (S SxL = L.S L.SxL) /* Assume that lagged S does not affect shocks in current Y */ xtabond Y L , lags(1) endogenous(L SxL) (Other covariates are omitted for ease of discussion) My problem is that clearly the idea that lagged SxL is probably going to be a very poor instrument for SxL close to the beginning of the "late" period. For instance, if "late" refers to 2001, lagged SxL will be zero. On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: > Dominic Soon <dominic.soon.etc@gmail.com> > -fe- is not an option for -xtabond-. Are you thinking you have a > dynamic panel model, or S is endogenous (i.e. you mean -xtivreg-)? If > the latter, what instruments are you using? You probably want L and > L*S included as regressors, and you then have 2 endog vars: S and L*S. > Then you want instruments that differentially affect S in the early > and late periods. > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Dominic Soon > <dominic.soon.etc@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Statalisters, >> >> I am trying to estimate a regression of two variables output (Y) on >> R&D capital stock (S), as well as some other variables (e.g. labour, >> capital, so on and so forth). For simplicity, let's say the model is: >> >> Y_it = a_i + beta * S_it + error term >> >> I am trying to see whether the coefficient beta is different between >> an (assumed) "early" and "late" period. I'm also attempting to run >> the regression using both fixed effects and GMM. >> >> The question is - are there any issues with this methodology, >> particularly when running a GMM estimation. Suppose I ran something >> like: >> >> xtabond Y S S_late, fe >> >> where S_late is equal to L times S, with L being a dummy variable that >> is equal to 1 if t is later than my (assumed) breakpoint, can the >> t-statistics be interpreted sensibly? >> > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Structural Break Type Test with Fixed Effects IV and GMM***From:*Dominic Soon <dominic.soon.etc@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Structural Break Type Test with Fixed Effects IV and GMM***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Plotting two densities (relative density) and decompose into location and shape components** - Next by Date:
**st: Expression too long** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Structural Break Type Test with Fixed Effects IV and GMM** - Next by thread:
**st: can't get rid of outer region margin in graph** - Index(es):