Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10? |

Date |
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:05:26 +0100 |

What examples do you have in mind? Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Martin Weiss The confusion is compounded by -display-'s uncanny ability to somehow circumvent the requirement for single quotes: As it takes an -expression-, it knows beforehand it needs to evaluate. Many users take its behavior as representative of the rest of Stata, I think... Nick Cox I think of ` ' as meaning "evaluate this here and now". Here should be obvious, but the now is important too, meaning precisely "before you try to execute this command line". `macname' is the canonical example for local macro macname. But `= 2 + 2' `c(date)' `r(varlist)' `e(cmdline)' `: value label foreign' are other examples in which you also want literal text substituted. I don't know if this is ever official wording -- indeed I doubt it -- but I think of examples other than the first as invoking the local macro persona of beasts that are not local macros in the most restricted sense but can behave similarly given persuasive syntax. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Michael I. Lichter I understand that single quotes are not simply local macro dereference operators, but it certainly looks like that's their function in the command line. Other than local macro, what can you dereference in this way? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**References**:**st: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

**st: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**st: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Michael I. Lichter" <mlichter@buffalo.edu>

**RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Next by Date:
**AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Previous by thread:
**AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Next by thread:
**AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10?** - Index(es):