Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Undocumented limitation of describe (and hence -ds-) in Stata 10? |
Date | Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:53:32 +0100 |
The article in question is reproduced in Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seventy-six Stata Tips, 2nd Edition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H. J. Newton and N. J. Cox, Editor http://www.stata.com/bookstore/tips2.html It's USD 29 to Michael. If anyone can find me, the book and a pen in the same place, I'll happily sign it too. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Michael I. Lichter I don't have access to Nick's article, unfortunately, so I don't know if he indicates where this is documented. Martin Weiss wrote: See also Nick`s http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-11/msg00769.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/