Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function

From   "Roman Kasal" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
Date   Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:46:41 +0200

I don't how to do it when you want to find out ratio between
years, male X female, ...? So there is no solution? Just to keep N,mean,
SE, degrees of freedom, N_strata, N_psu, .... and calculate it manually?
I think it is not appropriate solution, at least to have it as an
option. I think there is missing a lot with complex survey in Stata and
complex survey is needed for almost every survey research, even freeware
R-project is better equipped :(

so have a hope Stata will get it soon....immediately we are buying it
again :)

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Steven
Sent: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:30:10 -0400
Subject: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function

And it should.   Data (x,y) (1,2) (2,4) (3,6) (100,.)    will give an
entirely different view of the data if the unpaired observation is
included in a mean or ratio calculation.  Or consider data with x
missing in half the pairs and y missing in the other half; the ratio
of means would be meaningless.

The formulas for standard errors for ratios  assume that the data are
paired. Formally, they are based on the residual MSE of a regression
of y on x through the origin. You cannot do that regression with
unpaired data.

If your concern is missing data, the solution is to impute the missing
values before analysis.


-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Roman Kasal

> but it ignores unpaired data :(

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index