Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Roman Kasal" <kasal@trexima.cz> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function |

Date |
Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:37:18 +0200 |

I don't agree...so how to do it when you want to find out ratio between years, male X female, ...? So there is no solution? Just to keep N,mean, SE, degrees of freedom, N_strata, N_psu, .... and calculate it manually? I think it is not appropriate solution, at least to have it as an option. I think there is missing a lot with complex survey in Stata and complex survey is needed for almost every survey research, even freeware R-project is better equipped :( so have a hope Stata will get it soon....immediately we are buying it again :) > > And it should. Data (x,y) (1,2) (2,4) (3,6) (100,.) will give an entirely different view of the data if the unpaired observation is included in a mean or ratio calculation. Or consider data with x missing in half the pairs and y missing in the other half; the ratio of means would be meaningless. The formulas for standard errors for ratios assume that the data are paired. Formally, they are based on the residual MSE of a regression of y on x through the origin. You cannot do that regression with unpaired data. If your concern is missing data, the solution is to impute the missing values before analysis. Steve * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function***From:*Jeph Herrin <jeph.herrin@yale.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: SPost question- recording confidence intervals with praccum** - Next by Date:
**RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function** - Previous by thread:
**st: SPost question- recording confidence intervals with praccum** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function** - Index(es):