Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> |
To | stata list <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: AW: -findname- available from SSC |
Date | Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:44:21 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Martin Weiss wrote: > Could a dummy be "extended missing", as well? > > ************* > clear* > set obs 2 > gen byte mydummy=.a > replace mydummy=. in 2 > findname, all(@ == 0 | @ == 1 | @ == .) > ************* > > Would the syntax -findname, all(@ == 0 | @ == 1 | @ == missing(@))- > cover that, or rather: should it? I don't think so, a program should just do exactly what you tell it to do. So if you wanted to include extended missing values you should have written: findname, all(@ == 0 | @ == 1 | @ >= .) -- Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/