Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: endogeneity in seemingly unrelated regression
From
"Rao, James" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: endogeneity in seemingly unrelated regression
Date
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:16:27 +0200
Dear Stata listers,
I am estimating a system of equations using the sureg command but I happen to
have an endogenous variable among the regressors in all the equations in the
system.
y1 = a + endogenous_X + b1x1 + b2X2
y2 = endogenous_X + b3Z1
y3 = endogenous_X + b4Z2
I was thinking of using the "cmp" command to address the endogeneity of the
"endogenous_x" but am not sure if this is the right approach. Anyone with an
idea of how this problem could be resolved!
Sincerely,
==================================================
Rao E.O. James (Msc)
Research Associate/PhD Student
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development
Georg-August University of Göttingen
Platz der Gottinger Sieben 5
37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Tell:+49-551-394443 (Office)
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Courage is not the absence of fear but the triumph over it ... so fear not to
fear ... but strive to overcome fear!
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/