Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: -xthtaylor and weights
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: -xthtaylor and weights
Date
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:57:56 +0100
<>
" As far as I know, the -xthtaylor command allows [iw] or [fw]."
According to its help file, this depends on the estimator used. If you go for the default, your statement is true, if you want the -amacurdy- version, it is not. The dialog boxes are usually also a good way to explore the interplay between options.
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Davillas Apostolos
Sent: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 17:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: -xthtaylor and weights
Dear all,
As far as I know, the -xthtaylor command allows [iw] or [fw].
Applying the -xthtaylor without weights resulted to significant and
insignificant coefficients (various p-values).
However, after applying [iw], all the coefficients are strongly
significant (p-values:0.000).
Could you please give me any suggestions for this. I appreciate any help.
Thank you in advance.
Best wishes,
Apostolos
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/