Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Concordance
From
Tom Trikalinos <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Concordance
Date
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:02:06 -0500
Hi ricardo,
i'm off to a meeting -- thus not time for a proper response, but these
are pointers.
1. difference vs average plots
2. Lin's concoradance correlation coefficient rather than Pearson correlation
3. (reduced) major axis regression and related regressions ([weighted
] Deming, Passing-Bablock[spelling may be off?]) rather than OLS>
ssc install concord
will get you quite far actually.
N. orsini had written a deming routine i f I racall correctly.
take care,
t
Thomas A Trikalinos MD, PhD
Co-Director Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center
Associate Director, Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies
Tufts Medical Center | 800 Washington St | Boston, 02111 MA
Phone: +1 617 636 0734
Fax: +1 617 636 8628
email: [email protected]
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalist,
>
> Glucose on 100 serum samples was measured by two different methods. I would like to examine the concordance between the two set of measurements. The glucose values are continuous, so I was thinking about simply computing Pearson’s correlation coefficient, but that seems too simple and the test is not very sensitive. Is there a better way to assess concordance between two repeated measurements.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ricardo
>
> Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> Statistician
> Oklahoma City, OK
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/