Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: st: AW: Problem with grqreg
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
AW: st: AW: Problem with grqreg
Date
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:54:29 +0100
<>
So we are talking about
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-02/msg01052.html
As I said at the time
(http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-02/msg01054.html), I am not
going to mess around with somebody else`s ado. So here`s hoping that the
authors will update their program in the near future...
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von pili2010
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. März 2010 22:41
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: AW: Problem with grqreg
Dear Martin:
Thank you very much for your post. I am having exactly the same problem with
grqreg. I do not answerstand the solution you suggest "prepend the "rhs"
variables with the quantile in question, which could be achieved by
modifying the above call to - local rhs : colfullnames(e(b))-. . Could you
please explain me what to do?
Thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/st-Problem-with-grqreg-tp4618612p4718890.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/