Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: Why my codes run well on version 9.1 but not on version 10


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: AW: Why my codes run well on version 9.1 but not on version 10
Date   Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:06 +0100

<> 


Which variables are dropped? Are there any string variables in  the
-varlist- fed to -recode-? Type - ds, has(type string)- to find out
conveniently.

If so, what do you want -recode- to do to them?...



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Quang Nguyen
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 13:39
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: Why my codes run well on version 9.1 but not on version 10

Dear all:

We have a small program which run well on Stata version 9.1. However,
when we run it on Stata/SE 10, there is a message like " recode only
runs with numeric variable". We check and find that Stata just
automatically drop some variables in the in-between steps. This
happens as we run the program as a whole. If we run the program comand
by comand it works well. Do you know wht amight cause this, and what
is the solution.

Many thanks!

-- 
"My father gave me the greatest gift anyone could give another person,
he believed in me." - Jim Valvano
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index