[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: [iso-8859-1] We^Òre stumped!

From   Ronan Conroy <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: [iso-8859-1] We^Òre stumped!
Date   Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:49:53 +0000

On 27 Ean 2010, at 16:40, Florio Arguillas wrote:

Here's the situation. We used the same program for logistic regression, same version of STATA (v11, which was never updated since July '09), and
same data. We get the same means, standard deviation, coefficients,
standard errors, significance levels, odds-ratios and R^2, BUT we get a
different Model Constant and Log-likelihood figures. Both figures are
larger by about a factor of five from the original run of the model in
September '09. Any ideas about what would cause these two things to be

Would you mind pasting the results of both procedures into an email? Then we may be able to spot what's happening.

Ronan Conroy

[email protected]
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Epidemiology Department,
Beaux Lane House, Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 (0)1 402 2431
+353 (0)87 799 97 95
+353 (0)1 402 2764 (Fax - remember them?)

P    Before printing, think about the environment

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index