[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: [iso-8859-1] We^Òre stumped!

From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: [iso-8859-1] We^Òre stumped!
Date   Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:53:21 +0100


Are you confident that they are really the "same data"? The delimiters ","
and "." sometimes mean different things to different people. Different Oss
may take a different view as to their meaning...


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronan Conroy
Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010 19:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: [iso-8859-1] We^Òre stumped!

On 27 Ean 2010, at 16:40, Florio Arguillas wrote:

> Here's the situation. We used the same program for logistic  
> regression,
> same version of STATA (v11, which was never updated since July '09),  
> and
> same data. We get the same means, standard deviation, coefficients,
> standard errors, significance levels, odds-ratios and R^2, BUT we  
> get a
> different Model Constant and Log-likelihood figures. Both figures are
> larger by about a factor of five from the original run of the model in
> September '09. Any ideas about what would cause these two things to be
> different??

Would you mind pasting the results of both procedures into an email?  
Then we may be able to spot what's happening.

Ronan Conroy

[email protected]
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Epidemiology Department,
Beaux Lane House, Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 (0)1 402 2431
+353 (0)87 799 97 95
+353 (0)1 402 2764 (Fax - remember them?)

P    Before printing, think about the environment

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index