[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: estat abond when error is MA(1)

From   Hewan Belay <[email protected]>
To   Stata List <[email protected]>
Subject   st: estat abond when error is MA(1)
Date   Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:40 -0800 (PST)

Dear Statalist,

I wanted to confirm if my my derivation and understanding is correct: Suppose we assume that in a dynamic model the idiosyncratic error is not iid, but rather MA(1). In that case, the differenced error would be MA(2). So both the first- and the second-order serial correlation of the *differenced* error term would be non-zero, whereas the third- and higher-order correlations would be zero. Correct so far? 
In that case, if my assumption of an MA(1) process in the level of the error is on target, I should expect to see p-values for both the 1st and 2nd order of the -estat abond- test showing non-siginifant test stats, i.e. p-values higher than say 0.10. 
My first quetion is: is this right? And secondly, is there any other test through which I can discern if, say the third order correlation is indeed zero as it should be if the MA(1) errors assumption is appropriate? Please note that I am using an estimator with robust standard errors, so the postestimation test -estat sargan- is not available to me.
Many thanks!


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index