[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]> |

Subject |
AW: st: AW: How to solve this problem when running separate regression using stasby or looping |

Date |
Thu, 7 May 2009 23:47:09 +0200 |

<> I would suggest - postfile- if all you want are just the three columns... See http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=pr0036 HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Quang Nguyen Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2009 23:23 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: st: AW: How to solve this problem when running separate regression using stasby or looping Excellent, Martin. Thanks so much indeed. Using estout, can anyone suggest a quick solution to generate an output file that is similar to using _stasby_. In particular, I would like to have an output file as follows: id alpha r 1 1.2 0.04 2 1.5 0.06 .............................. I use _esttab, however, the output look a bit messy. Many thanks! On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > <> > > I would install -ssc d estout- and combine it with -capture- > > > ************* > forval i = 1/184 > { > capt eststo: nl (reward=y^{alpha=1}*{beta=0.6}*exp(-{r=0.1}*t)) if > id==`i' > } > ************* > > > > HTH > Martin > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Quang Nguyen > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2009 17:27 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: st: How to solve this problem when running separate regression > using stasby or looping > > Dear All, > > I would like to run separate estimation equations for each individual. > Using the _stasby_ command such as: > > statsby, by(id): nl (reward=y^{alpha=1}*{beta=0.6}*exp(-{r=0.1}*t)) > > Stata doesn't work since there missing value or inconvergence for some > individuals. Using the loop such as: > > forval i = 1(1)184 > { > nl (reward=y^{alpha=1}*{beta=0.6}*exp(-{r=0.1}*t)) if id==`i' > } > > The same thing happens. > > Can you suggest me a solution so that Stata can go on with the > estimation for all "estimable" individuals and assign missing value to > the case with inconergence or missing value? > > Many thanks! > -- > "My father gave me the greatest gift anyone could give another person, > he believed in me." - Jim Valvano > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- "My father gave me the greatest gift anyone could give another person, he believed in me." - Jim Valvano * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Type mismatch in while and somes issues with statalist** - Next by Date:
**st: AW: Type mismatch in while and somes issues with statalist** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: AW: How to solve this problem when running separate regression using stasby or looping** - Next by thread:
**AW: st: AW: How to solve this problem when running separate regression using stasby or looping** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |