[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: statweave |

Date |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:14:36 -0600 |

Phil Schumm presented something along the similar lines of combining LaTeX code with Stata code at one of the NASUGs, two or three years ago. I am happy with producing all my tables using -estout- and then \input{}ing them. I am OK with hitting some buttons twice. The thing is, if a person has figured out LaTeX, they would be able to figure out -file- and all that to produce whatever formatting they need. But I would guess that on statalist, 75% of people copy/paste their results to Word, and it is evene worse in the Big World of Stata users where the ratio will more likely be 90% to 10%. The LaTeX base is there, it is active, but hardly overwhelming. I would imagine that with R users, the situation is likely to be reverse: LaTeX is pretty much a prerequisite to writing a dissertation with more than 10 formulas in it... and most (bio)statistics or econometrics dissertations would probably exceed that limit. And that's where R is sitting. On 2/23/09, David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> wrote: > . > > the longer version.... > > http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/Talks/litdoc.pdf > > In this thread I'm opening discussion of what is available in terms of > approaches comparable to Sweave with Stata. This is obviously not just for > LaTeX since ODT formats were mentioned in StatWeave above, but XML really > opens the can. > > -Davee > > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 8:28 AM, David Airey wrote: > > > > . > > > > Here one of R's own pushes to forget about Sweave in favor of XML. That > might be a direction for Stata to go in, since XML is open and all we might > think about is a comparable routine to Sxslt > (http://www.omegahat.org/Sxslt/). > > > > > http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/Talks/litdocbrief.pdf > > > > -Dave > > > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:27 AM, David Airey wrote: > > > > > > > . > > > > > > From the developer's page, which makes little sense to me as to why > there is no direct support on the Mac, as the format of the graph can be PDF > or EPS, which is what is required for LaTeX. I guess he is talking about > OpenOffice. > > > > > > Stata: > > > ----- > > > * Available graphics formats are platform-dependent: > > > Linux: EPS only > > > Mac: PDF and EPS > > > Windows: PNG and EPS > > > Thus, except on Windows, Stata graphics are NOT directly supported > > > for ODT source/target files, because ODT does not support EPS or PDF. > > > For the same reason, for a LaTeX source file, you can't directly get > > > graphics when the target is PDF. One way to work around this is to > > > configure appropriate graphics-format converters (Manual Section 6.4). > > > For Linux LaTeX with a PDF target, an alternative is to make the DVI > > > target, then convert that to PDF using dvipdf, dvipdfm, or similar. > > > > > > On Feb 22, 2009, at 9:55 PM, David Airey wrote: > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > I did find this of course, but wanted to know about real world > experiences... > > > > > > > > http://www.stata.com/meeting/italy08/rising_2008.pdf > > > > > > > > I am also wondering if Bill Rising is improving the rough edges of > StatWeave with regard to Stata use alluded to in the talk. > > > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > > > > On Feb 22, 2009, at 9:47 PM, David Airey wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone used StatWeave > <http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/StatWeave/> to make > LaTeX documents on Apple OS X Leopard with Stata 10? Has anyone used > StatWeave with Stata at all? > > > > > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > * > > > > > * For searches and help try: > > > > > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > > > > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > > > > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > * For searches and help try: > > > > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > > > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > > > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > > > > > > > * > > > * For searches and help try: > > > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > > > > * > > * For searches and help try: > > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu>

**References**:**st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

**Re: st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

**Re: st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

**Re: st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

**Re: st: statweave***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: combining frequency tables** - Next by Date:
**st: AW: combining frequency tables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: statweave** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: statweave** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |