|  | 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Correcting for SEs in complex survey design
From 
 
Steven Samuels <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
Re: st: Correcting for SEs in complex survey design 
Date 
 
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:08:13 -0500 
--
Erin:
With survey data, standard errors are based on between-PSU  
variability.  You do not need a family level cluster variable.
If you wish to model the clustering of responses within households  
and to estimate the household, parent, and child contributions to  
variation, try -gllamm-, available from ssc. It will accommodate the  
survey weights and allows a cluster (PSU) variable that is not in the  
multilevel model.
Take a look at: Anders Skrondal1 and Sophia Rabe-Hesketh. Some  
applications of generalized linear latent and mixed models in  
epidemiology: Repeated measures, measurement error and multilevel  
modeling. Norsk Epidemiologi 2003; 13 (2):265-278 265
Regards,
Steve
On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Erin Hye-Won Kim wrote:
Dear statalisters,
I am analyzing data from a survey with complex design. The dataset  
has both
clusters and strata, so I used
svyset psuid [pweight=weight], strata(stratid)
The dataset is representative of individual parents and many  
parents have
multiple children. To analyze the relationship between a parent and  
each of
his/her children,
I reshape the dataset from a wide to a long format as in the following
parent1 child1 child2.... ==> parent1-child1
                              parent1-child2
In regressions after reshaping, I have to correct for SEs since  
siblings are
correlated, so I tried the following
svy: regress Y Xs, cluster(parent_id)
STATA says "svy" cannot be used with "cluster" option. Is there any  
way to
correct for SEs while circumventing this problem?
---------------------------------------------------------
In addition, I tried family fixed-effects models by controlling for  
parent_ids.
svy: aregress Y Xs, absorb(parent id)
Again STATA says "svy" cannot go with "areg". There are too many  
parent_ids to
control manually. Is there any solution to this problem?
---------------------------------------------------------
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
| © Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |