[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression

From   Steven Samuels <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: adjusted R2 in survey regression
Date   Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:44:22 -0400

Stas's post led me to go back and check what -svy: reg- does produce, something I should have done earlier. -svy: reg- does display an R- Squared and it is the "really obvious" one, the adjusted R-Squared.


On Oct 15, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Stas Kolenikov wrote:

If Stata does not produce something really obvious, like R2 or
adjusted R2, then it means they looked into this and decided it had
dubious statistical properties.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Aca N.T. <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm puzzled with model building using -svy: reg- for there is no
adjusted R squared produced.
Is there an alternative test for this?

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index