Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: RE: mfx after xtnbreg and how to compute predicted Y


From   "Pek-Hooi Soh" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: RE: mfx after xtnbreg and how to compute predicted Y
Date   Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:47:21 -0700

Hi Nick, 

I was told that the coefficients of non linear models cannot be used
directly for interpretation, and I should use mfx that give the marginal
effects (exp(B),I think). In the table, the dydx column output is the same
as the coefficients of xtnbreg, the x column is the only extra information.
What is x?  

Cheers,

Pek


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: October-19-08 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: mfx after xtnbreg and how to compute predicted Y

-mfx- is giving you extra information for the model you just ran. 

The help for -xtnbreg postestimation- indicate how to get predictions in
Stata. There is no need to resort to any other software. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Pek-Hooi Soh

I have a count panel data model with interaction terms where the terms
are mean centered.  

I estimated the full model by -xtnbreg- and ran -mfx-.  The marginal effect
table presents the same coefficients and standard errors as the table for
-xtnbreg-. Is this possible?

If I do get the correct -mfx- output, how do I compute predicted Y? Do I
have
compute y = exp(XB) where B stores marginal effects separately in Excel ?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index