[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Re: Brant test

From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: Re: Brant test
Date   Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:09:51 +0200

Has (pp.199-200) been
mentioned yet? They are probably a good point of entry, being the authors of
the command...


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Williams
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 6:07 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: Re: Brant test

At 08:24 AM 10/18/2008, Gao LIU wrote:
>The results are similar, but not the same. What might cause the difference?

Brant and gologit2 take different approaches.  They generally are 
pretty close on the global test but might differ on tests of 
individual variables.  You can also try out -omodel- from SSC.

The way to do a global test in gologit2 is something like

gologit2 y x1 x2 x3, pl store(m1)
gologit2 y x1 x2 x3, npl store(m2)
lrtest m1 m2, stats

For more on gologit2, see

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  [email protected]

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index