[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: do-file hygeine

From   David Radwin <[email protected]>
To   Statalist <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: do-file hygeine
Date   Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:47:04 -0700

In my opinion, more fundamental than the mechanics of managing do-files is the philosophy that your work should be replicable by another researcher in the sense that if she were to use the same data and methods. In the specific case of Stata, that would ideally mean the same dataset, do-files, and programs could be used to create exactly the same results, including such niceties as using the -set seed- command, but the replication principle goes far beyond that.

A side benefit of this philosophy is that it may force you to be more explicit and thoughtful about your data analysis decisions.

For a nice discussion of replication in the social sciences, see Gary King, "Replication, Replication," PS: Political Science and Politics, followed by comments from nineteen authors and a response, Vol. XXVIII, No. 3 (September, 1995): pp. 443-499 and .


At 11:08 AM -0700 9/27/08, Michael McCulloch wrote:

I'd appreciate any pointers toward good do-file hygeine, i.e. management practices to maximize good record keeping, with resulting least likelihood of overlooking important details.

David Radwin // [email protected]
Office of Student Research, University of California, Berkeley
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index