[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: A comment on abbreviations

From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Re: A comment on abbreviations
Date   Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:00:20 +0200

Guilty as charged! But sometimes fast turnaround on the list renders such practices necessary. At the end of the day, Stata understands you when you enter -h prob-: The correct help file appears, so it is possible to understand what the line "prob f p w" means.
Secondly, the output that appears on screen after the command also clearly says what Stata has just calculated.
I was not aware that there was an FAQ explicitly prohibiting abbreviations. Sorry about that...

----- Original Message ----- From: "Svend Juul" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:52 PM
Subject: st: A comment on abbreviations

Abbreviations make it easier to write a text, but more difficult to read it. Especially if your experience with the language is limited, abbreviations make life difficult. I have the impression that the use of abbreviations at Statalist have increased during the last months, and recently a response included this:
prob f p w

It means
probit foreign price weight
- and that is much easier to read.

The Statalist FAQ includes good advice, mostly to less experienced users seeking help. I think it should also include this advice to the more experienced users offering help:

Be helpful. Avoid abbreviations.




Svend Juul
Institut for Folkesundhed, Afdeling for Epidemiologi
(Institute of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology)
Vennelyst Boulevard 6
DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Phone, work: +45 8942 6090
Phone, home: +45 8693 7796
Fax: +45 8613 1580
E-mail: [email protected]

* For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index