Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: RE: Trouble with `=`_N'-1'


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: RE: RE: Trouble with `=`_N'-1'
Date   Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:02:57 +0200

On that point: while writing my post, I dodged the question of how to call
_N by its name. I probably should have said "system variable", as in -h
_variables-...

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 5:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: RE: Trouble with `=`_N'-1'

Just to underline Martin's analysis: the reference `_N' would be
appropriate if _N were the name of a local macro, but _N is not a local
macro. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Martin Weiss

Stata does not know what to do about `_N', so it evaluates to nothing.
The
whole -in- statement evaluates to - in -1 - which denotes the last
observation. Say -replace line = 5 in `=_N-1'- and it works fine. Now _N
is
well defined and the expression evaluates to the desired value. Note
that
you could have put - in -2 - to begin with, and would have saved
yourself
the trouble...

Ashim Kapoor

I wish to make a change in the 2nd last observation.

so I have : replace line = 5 in `=`_N'-1'

But this change the LAST observation! Am I doing something wrong?

funnily replace line = 5 if _n==_N-1 works fine!


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index