[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis

From   Chris Witte <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis
Date   Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:44:14 -0700 (PDT)

Not to stoke the fire, but why would Mahmoud think he would need to read the FAQ page?� The question he had is hardly "frequently asked".� I suggest putting these "rules" either on the same page as the instructions to subscribe to the list (so people would be more likely to glance over them before subscribing) or on a separate page titled something like "Statalist Usage Guidelines".� 

----- Original Message ----
From: Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 8:09:05 PM
Subject: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis

Mahmoud Abd-El-Aal replied to Nick Cox:


> 1- I did not have time to read the FAQs since i just joined and trying to
> get my questions answered rather than read the rules on how to use the
> list, but i will do that and next time i will try not to disobey the
> rules.


I rather think this says it all, and precisely reinforces what Nick
patiently explained to you.

You say you didn't have the time to read the Statalist FAQ before
posting. Why, then, do you expect others to spare their time answering
your queries?

No reply expected or required. :)

Clive Nicholas

[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]

"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*� For searches and help try:


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index