[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Austin Nichols" <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: CI for growth rate |

Date |
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:34:47 -0400 |

Martin Weiss <[email protected]>: -ratio- is for the ratio of means, not the mean of ratios. Are these panel data with multiple observations on individuals? I assume so. In that case, just calculate the ratio, or the percentage growth, directly, and then use -ci- or alternatives: webuse psidextract, clear keep if t>5 g w=exp(lwage) keep id t lwage w reshape wide w lwage, i(id) j(t) ratio w7/w6 g pcg=100*(w7-w6)/w6 la var pcg "Percentage growth in wage rate" ci pcg kdensity pcg su pcg, d Note that the ratio of means is not equal to the mean of ratios (generically). Also note there will be a long right tail and probably no large negative values, so the median will be a better measure of "typical" wage growth than the mean. Also, how will you deal with individuals who have no observed wages in one of the two years? Both years? Or an observed wage rate of zero (volunteers)? Or multiple observed wage rates (at multiple jobs)? Your question makes me think you've got "wide" data, so I -reshape-d the data in the example above to wide form. It's usually better to keep panel data in long form, like so: webuse psidextract, clear g w=exp(lwage) bys id (t): g pcg=100*(w-L.w)/L.w la var pcg "Percentage growth in wage rate" g g=_n-51 in 1/200 la var g "Percentage growth in wage rate" forv t=2/7 { kdensity pcg if t==`t', at(g) gen(d`t') bw(1) nogr } line d? g, leg(off) xla(-50(10)100) su pcg if t==7, d On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Statalisters, > > if I had wage data for two years, say 1999 and 2000, and wanted a CI for the > growth rate of wages, would it be correct to let -ratio- calculate the ratio > between the two years (which would yield something like 1.0342, denoting a > 3.42% growth rate), take the CI from ratio and subtract one? So if ratio > returned a CI of [1.023;1.044], would the CI for the growth rate be 2.3% to > 4.4%? Or am I missing something? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: Creating a local macro with a colon** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: coding households in survey data** - Previous by thread:
**st: CI for growth rate** - Next by thread:
**st: coding households in survey data** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |