Indeed.
The version now on SSC is a rather old one. Perhaps it should be deleted
so that -findit- points only to the SJ files.
Nick
[email protected]
Fred Wolfe
It's kind of my fault for not knowing this, but -ssc install concord,
replace- doesn't find a new version. But if you know there is one (as
I now do) you can get it through -findit-..
. which concord, all
c:\ado\stbplus\c\concord.ado
*! 3.0.3 6oct2004 TJS & NJC rewrite for Stata 8
. . ssc install concord, replace
checking concord consistency and verifying not already installed...
all files already exist and are up to date.
// get it through findit-
. which concord, all
c:\ado\stbplus\c\concord.ado
*! 3.0.7 9aug2007 TJS & NJC fixed Stata 10 bug by adding missing
-version-
On 1/24/08, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> This has been fixed for some time, as was promised. The update was in
> Stata Journal 7(3) 2007.
>
> Note that, as mentioned by Fred, the fault here was not with
StataCorp.
> It was the authors' [let's say: mine] in not including a -version-
> statement. That was certainly accidental, not deliberate.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Fred Wolfe
>
> I was burned using -concord- which has version control in subprograms,
> but doesn't have it in the main programs. It perhaps needs a two word
> revision.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
