Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: Why was -index()- dropped?


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: Why was -index()- dropped?
Date   Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:56:01 -0000

-index()- remains available under version control. 

The principle appears to be that the names of string functions should
include the substring -str-. But what is a string function? In Stata 
-real()- takes a string argument and yields a numeric result, but its
name does not match -strtotreal()- used in Mata. 

Also, -indexnot()- is an anomaly, as its name now does not match its
sibling -strpos()-. I surmise that to be oversight. 

Well, nobody's perfect ("Some like it hot", last line). 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Newson, Roger B

I have a Stata 10 query on string functions. Why is the string function
-index()- no longer available in Stata 10 (as it was in Stata 9 and
several previous versions)? I would be surprised if I couldn't find
substitutes for it on a case-by-case basis, but was there any special
reason for dropping it?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index