[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: Re: strange world

From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: Re: strange world
Date   Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:12:21 -0000

Ron´┐Żn is right to remind us that logical (true-or-false) conditions can be 
combined, and I'll say more about this in another post, but 
this example would I think not bite users hard even with a three-way logic
in which such conditions coould take on possible values of True, False, 
or Missing. Thus 

condition | condition | condition | ... 

would surely be treated as True if at least one of the conditions 
were True, and as Missing if and only if all the conditions were Missing. 

[email protected] 

Ronan Conroy

There's another consideration too. Logical operators are often found  
in complex expressions. While sometimes you have to guard against  
missing values, some expressions depend on all variable being  
nonmissing, while others do not.


. gen underweight = (bmi1 < 19 ) | (bmi2 < 19) | (bmi3 < 19)
. lab var underweight "At least one body mass index below 19"

The variable thus defined can be calculated even when one or two of  
the bmi variables are missing. If that's fine by you, then Stata  
should not stand in your way.

The user might specify

. egen bmi_missing = rowmiss(bmi1 bmi2 bmi3)
. gen underweight = (bmi1 < 19 ) | (bmi2 < 19) | (bmi3 < 19) if  
bmi_missing < 2

which would allow the expression to be evaluated if there were at  
least two BMI measurements. But the choice of how many missing  
measurements to tolerate has to be a scientific one.

For this reason, I think that the user is the only person who knows  
under what circumstances a logical expression should evaluate to  
missing. It's unfortunate that Stata, SAS and SPlus/R have different  
ways of handling missing data in logical expressions, but I don't  
think that switching to the S philosophy that x < NA evaluates to NA  
is going to be any easier.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index