|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: A Question on Simulating S.E of the Elasticities
Dear All,
Basically, I have estimated a system of the cost and labor-share
equation using ISURE. I am using time-series of a particular U.S.
industry stretched over 1958-2000 for 43 years. Then I have generated a
variable called "sve_sg" as this new variable is a function of all RHS
variables of the cost function. Then, I have generated the elasticities
of this new defined variable "sve_sg" with respect to each factor as it
is function of that factor. For example, If I would like to calculate
its elasticity with respect to the factor"l" , in doing so, the first,
I generate this elasticity, named, "Isvl_sr_sg" as you see in the
following. so that this generated elasticity is a function of some
variables that each are as function of the estimated coefficients and
RHS variables of the cost function. I have include all of these
variables in the following.
Isvl_sr_sg = (d2cel_sg)*((pl_sg)/(sve_sg))
where
d2cel_sg = ((pvc_sg)*(_b[lple_sg]+(sve_sghat*sl_sghat)))/((pl_sg)*(e_sg))
sve_sg = (sve_sghat)*(pvc_sg / e_sg)
sl_sghat = _b[lpl_sg] + _b[lple_sg]*le_sg + _b[lplk_sg]*lk_sg +
_b[lplt_sg]*t
sve_sghat =_b[le_sg] + _b[lple_sg]*lpl_sg + _b[lpme_sg]*lpm_sg +
_b[lek_neg_sg]*lk_sg + _b[let_sg]*t
pvc_sg = (exp(_b[_cons] + _b[lq_sg]*lq_sg + _b[lpl_sg]*lpl_sg +
_b[lpm_sg]*lpm_sg + _b[lk_sg]*lk_sg +_b[le_sg]*le_sg + _b[t]*t +
_b[lple_sg]*lple_sg + _b[lplk_sg]*lplk_sg + _b[lpme_sg]*lpme_sg +
_b[lpmk_sg]*lpmk_sg + _b[lek_neg_sg]*lek_neg_sg + _b[lplt_sg]*lplt_sg +
_b[lpmt_sg]*lpmt_sg + _b[let_sg]*let_sg + _b[lkt_sg]*lkt_sg))
My target is simulating the standard errors(S.E) of such elasticity over
43 years. To do so, my procedure is that I initially re-run the ISURE
model and then I am using the following "testnl" command as follows:
est replay "ISURE"
testnl [=lvc_sg]: Isvl_sr_sg // lvc_sg is the cost function.
But, after runnign my .do file, I am getting the following error. Can
anybody help me out that what is wrong with using "testnl" command?
testnl [=lvc_sg]: Isvl_sr_sg
(1) [ = lvc_sg]: Isvl_sr_sg
equation [-(lvc_sg] not found
r(303);
end of do-file
r(303);
I am not sure whether this procedure to simulate S.E of the Isvl_sr_sg
is correct or not. If not so, anybody please can help me on this
matter, how to calculate the S.E though any other way?
Thank you
Asgar Kh.
University of Calgary-Canada
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/