[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Ronan Conroy <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: calculating relative risk |

Date |
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:25:18 +0000 |

On 4 Dec 2007, at 22:46, Sue Kim wrote:

I think it's time to listen to Stata. The trouble with the relative risk is that it can produce nonsense estimates of probability in some cases. If a risk factor has a relative risk of 2, and a case has a predicted probability, based on other risk factors, of 0.6, then the addition of the final risk factor will bring the predicted risk to 1.2.Hi. I have a binary outcome where the probability of outcome is low so I want to get an adjusted relative risk (rather than odds ratio) using glm. When using glm with fam(bin) link(log) command, I get a warning "parameter estimates produce inadmissible mean estimates in one or more observation". Could I still use the results or is there a way to get around this problem?

The odds ratio, for all its awkwardness, hasn't got this drawback.

Incidentally, Stata has a command -binreg- which is a canned version of what you have been doing. It has an option to give you the relative risk directly.

P Before printing, think about the environment

=================================

Ronan Conroy

[email protected]

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Epidemiology Department,

120 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

+353 (0)1 402 2431

+353 (0)87 799 97 95

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ronanconroy/sets/72157601895416740/

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: calculating relative risk***From:*Sue Kim <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: coding categorical variables** - Next by Date:
**st: Cutoff estimation by MLE** - Previous by thread:
**st: calculating relative risk** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: calculating relative risk** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |