[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected], [email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit |

Date |
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:24:16 -0500 |

At 09:54 PM 10/30/2007, Clive Nicholas wrote:

Indeed you will. :) If, say, 55% of the cases are 1, you could still mis-classify 45% of the cases. The adjusted count R^2 is better because it tells you how much better you are doing than by just always picking whichever category is in the majority. This, and some other measures of fit, are discussed here:Dan Weitzenfeld wrote: > What is the best way to communicate to non-statisticians the Goodness > of Fit (gof) of an ordered logit/ordered probit model? > > For OLS, there is the trusty R2, letting you tell a non-statistician, > "I can explain X% of the variation in the dependent variable." > > For logit/probit, I've used the probability of correct classification, > type I and type II error rates as my go-to metric for gof. Personally speaking, I've never thought the 'percentage correctly classified' summary statistic (which I think you're referring to) to be particularly meaningful, since it can hardly fail when Y=1 in more than 50% of the observations. No doubt I'll get lynched for saying this.

http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/L04.pdf

The count measures can be pretty much useless when one outcome is rare, e.g. only 10% get a zero, because it will then often be the case that every case gets predicted as a 1.

In general, I agree with your other comments though. Of course, the original question was, How do I explain this stuff to the masses? That is tough. If the masses insist on some sort of pseudo R^2, you need to explain that pseudo R^2 stats are generally much lower than OLS R^2 stats.

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: [email protected]

WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit***From:*"Clive Nicholas" <[email protected]>

**References**:**st: Gof for ologit/oprobit***From:*"Dan Weitzenfeld" <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit***From:*"Clive Nicholas" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Gof for ologit/oprobit** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |