[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Rodrigo A. Alfaro" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]> |

Subject |
Re: st: Saving intermediate results (variables) when running -simulate- |

Date |
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:18:38 -0400 |

Rachel,

Maarten gave you the efficient answer: set seed. With that you can reproduce exactly the same simulations in the future and change whatever you want in the analysis of the simulated datasets.

Alternative, but inefficiently, you could divide the process in 2 steps: (1) generate a general dataset, (2) do the analysis using loops. It is inefficient for 2 reasons: you are storing simulated datasets (trash) in your hard drive and a similar process (generating the data, doing the analysis) will take much more time here than using -simulate-.

I don't know under what conditions the alternative is actually necessary. Maybe your model is so far from the standard uniform or multivariate normal, then you have to compute several transformations. For example, you are interested in running y against x, and doing analysis of that relationship (prediction, etc). But y and x must be generated in a very long procedure that it is time-consuming.

Rodrigo.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Maarten buis" <[email protected]>

To: <[email protected]>

Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 3:04 AM

Subject: Re: st: Saving intermediate results (variables) when running -simulate-

--- Rachel <[email protected]> wrote:If I understand this correctly, the estimates resulting from the simulation below should be the same for all 20 repetitions if the same seed is used for each one.That would be true, but that is not what I have done in the example, or what I advised you to do. If you look at the example (and actually execute it, you will see it from the results) you will see I set the seed only twice: once for generating the original 20 simulations, and once for reproducing the 20 datasets. So I proposed that you set the seed, than create 20, or 100, 1000, or whatever number of different random datasets. In that case you can recreate all those datasets just by setting that original seed again. What I did not propose is that you set the seed for each random dataset is created, as that would indeed lead to 20 identical datasets. In other words, -set seed 12345- should appear outside the loop not inside the loop.No, that is unnecesary.Would it make sense to set the seed itself to be a random number and then return the seed as a scalar so that the rest of the dataset could be reproduced?

-----------------------------------------

Maarten L. Buis

Department of Social Research Methodology

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Boelelaan 1081

1081 HV Amsterdam

The Netherlands

visiting address:

Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/

-----------------------------------------

___________________________________________________________

Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Saving intermediate results (variables) when running -simulate-***From:*Maarten buis <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: -usesas- and formats** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: find-replace in stata** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Saving intermediate results (variables) when running -simulate-** - Next by thread:
**st: find-replace in stata** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |