Re: st: Standard error of the estimate for svy: reg

[Steven Samuels <sjhsamuels@earthlink.net>]

Lost Line

Rich,
I don't have access to this journal.  My question: standard error of  
WHAT estimate?

-Steve

On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Richard Forshee wrote:


> Sacrificial line
>
> A recent article in my field encourages reporting both the R- 
> squared and the
> Standard Error of the Estimate (or Root MSE).  (James S. Krueger  
> and Michael
> S. Lewis-Beck. Goodness-of-Fit: R-Squared, SEE and ‘Best  
> Practice’.  The
> Political Methodologist, vol. 15, no. 1, pp 2-4.  2007)
>
> When I run a svy: reg command, I do not see the SEE (or Root MSE)  
> reported.
> I checked ereturn list, and I did not see anything that appeared to  
> be the
> SEE.  Is there a way calculate the SEE when running a svy: reg  
> command?
> Maybe it could be derived using the predict , stdp postestimation  
> command?
> Or is there a reason that SEE is not appropriate in the context of  
> a svy:
> reg command?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/