[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: Does a do file know its own name?

From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: Does a do file know its own name?
Date   Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:01:20 +0100

As regards the -creturn- idea, the fact that 
do files can call other do files -- which is 
half the point of some contributions to this thread --
has implications for that. Normally a returned 
result of this kind would be a single filename, 
which might be the last do-file called. I guess
there is no insuperable barrier to returning 
a vector of filenames somehow, so that the names of 
all those currently running are somehow accessible. 
How far that would be needed or used by anybody 
I don't know. 


Skinner Jane Dr (MED)
> Many thanks to everybody who replied.  I have installed dolog -
> thanks, Roger!  (It's essentially the same as Nick's suggestion,
> with some further refinements.)
> I would like to add my voice to those who would like to see a
> "currently running" section accessible by creturn.  I quite often
> write customised output to csv files, and it would be nice if these
> could have the same name as their do-file creators, without the
> necessity of having a wrapper command to run do files with filenames
> as arguments.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2023 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index