[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Austin Nichols" <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Question about cumulative density (cumul, xtile) -- quintiles and poverty status are not in sync. What am I doing wrong? |

Date |
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:06:04 -0400 |

Anna Gueorguieva-- I doubt that switching between [aw] and [pw] affects your results, since you are not calculating SEs and point estimates are unaffected by the weight specification. I suspect that the problem is that you have a variable real_totc and a variable real_totc_per_ae and you expect them to line up perfectly when they do not. Try instead: bys wave: cumul real_totc_per_ae [aw=postpweight], gen(cdist) gen quint = ceil(5 * cdist) You might also just report the percent poor by wave, so you know where in the distribution povline_m falls (and therefore how the tab of quintile vs poor should look). On 8/3/07, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > I have thoughts on various levels. Others > can advise better on survey statistics, the quantum > mechanics of statistics, in which thinking you > understand probably means you are not confused > at a high enough level. > > 1. I see that you are using -cumul- with -aweight- and > -xtile- with -pweight- and I would have thought it quite > likely that that would be a source of difficulty. > I know that -cumul- doesn't support -pweight-, > but ignoring that problem won't be a solution. > > -cumul- itself is not a big deal; so as long > as you can define the cumulative for a set > of values with associated pweights, its > computation should be easy, using -sum()- > to cumulate. > > 2. You reported problems with -xtile2-. > Please say where user-written programs you > are using come from. -xtile2- is a user-written > program from SSC. It gives you the error > you report, I surmise, because it lacks > a -version- statement and so is broken > by a later change in Stata's syntax. This > issue was discussed at length in a recent > thread on -outreg2-. I think you need > to insert > > version 7 > > after the -program- statement. > > 3. I think that the term "cumulative > distribution function" is more nearly > standard. I know that a density function > is integrated to get a distribution > function, but the result is no longer > a density. Anyway, literatures may differ, > but my impression is that cumulative > density is not a standard term. > > 4. Code like > > gen quint=1 if cumdens<=.2 > replace quint=2 if cumdens>.2&cumdens<=.4 > replace quint=3 if cumdens>.4&cumdens<=.6 > replace quint=4 if cumdens>.6&cumdens<=.8 > replace quint=5 if cumdens>.8&cumdens~=. > > could be condensed to this > > gen quint = ceil(5 * cumdens) > > Here -ceil()- short for "ceiling" > rounds up to the nearest integer. Also > there is need to trap missings. > > -ceil()- is discussed in > > SJ-3-4 dm0002 . . . . . . . . Stata tip 2: Building with floors and ceilings > Q4/03 SJ 3(4):446--447 (no commands) > tips for using floor() and ceil() > > and again in "33 Stata Tips" available > from StataCorp in paperback. > > Nick > [email protected] > > Anna Gueorguieva > > > My quintiles and poverty status do not seem to be in sync and > > I have no idea what is going on!! > > > > I generate my indicator for poor as having consumption per > > adult equivalent below the poverty line. > > gen poor=real_totc_per_ae<=povline_m > > > > Then I generate my quintiles by creating a cumulative > > distribution of consumption (in each survey wave) > > I use xtile and then double check it with the cumulative density. > > > > foreach x of numlist 1/4{ > > xtile quint`x'= real_totc_per_ae [pw=postpweight] if wave==`x',nq(5) > > } > > gen quint=quint1 > > foreach x of numlist 1/4{ > > replace quint=quint`x' if wave==`x' > > } > > > > bys wave: cumul real_totc [aweight=postpweight], gen(cumdens) > > > > *check quints > > replace quint=1 if cumdens<=.2 > > replace quint=2 if cumdens>.2&cumdens<=.4 > > replace quint=3 if cumdens>.4&cumdens<=.6 > > replace quint=4 if cumdens>.6&cumdens<=.8 > > replace quint=5 if cumdens>.8&cumdens~=. > > And the problem is below -- it is not possible that there are > > poor people in quintile 3!!!! : > > tab quint poor [aw=postpweight] if wave==2, col nof > > Quintile | > > of | > > national | > > distributi | poor > > on | 0 1 | Total > > -----------+----------------------+---------- > > 1 | 0.00 45.96 | 19.98 > > 2 | 0.40 45.44 | 19.98 > > 3 | 28.81 8.61 | 20.03 > > 4 | 35.19 0.00 | 19.89 > > 5 | 35.60 0.00 | 20.12 > > -----------+----------------------+---------- > > Total | 100.00 100.00 | 100.00 > > > > And xtile2 gives me an error: > > xtile2 newquint=real_totc_per_ae [pw=postpweight] ,nq(5) by(wave) > > program error: matching close brace not found > > r(198); > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: regressing on percentages.***From:*Ricardo Ovaldia <[email protected]>

**References**:**st: Question about cumulative density (cumul, xtile) -- quintiles and poverty status are not in sync. What am I doing wrong?***From:*Anna Gueorguieva <[email protected]>

**st: RE: Question about cumulative density (cumul, xtile) -- quintiles and poverty status are not in sync. What am I doing wrong?***From:*"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Binomial regression** - Next by Date:
**st: Help for Graph Windows Tab in Stata V10** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: Question about cumulative density (cumul, xtile) -- quintiles and poverty status are not in sync. What am I doing wrong?** - Next by thread:
**st: regressing on percentages.** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |