Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: RE: Antispam message

From   Marcello Pagano <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: RE: Antispam message
Date   Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:06:25 -0400

I understand this this form of anti-spam is obnoxious, and I'll see what I
can do about it. But we should not go away from this as anti-anti-spammers.
One reason this list has not been that affected by spam so far is that we
have an anti-spam program running here which has blocked quite a
few messages from getting onto the list. I don't know if any of these
spam messages were written by the authors of the anti-spam software
trying to build up sales--I'll leave that speculation to the cynics out there!

But this thread is starting to sound like spam.


Richard Williams wrote:

At 11:11 AM 4/19/2006, Nick Cox wrote:

In the limit, this kind of behaviour would mean
that each of us must send every message to a new recipient
_twice_, and I join firmly with Al Feiveson in just
not wanting to do that.

To clarify, after you have responded _once_ by saying you are not a spammer, the antispam program leaves you alone after that. Nonetheless, it is a nuisance to ask potentially hundreds of people to send you that message, particularly since people will often be afraid they are falling into some sort of trap. I can see the purpose behind such a program but people who have it should not sign up for listserves, especially when a digest alternative is available. If Notre Dame adopted such a program today, I am sure our computing office would have at least 100 complaints by tomorrow!

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index