st: Thanks, Really! => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar

[Hiroshi Maeda <hmaeda1@uic.edu>]

Dear Dr. Nichols,
Well, e-mail communication is hard! I was not being clear in my previous 
note thanking YOU! I understood you first time and tried your 
suggestions, which worked perfectly (Well, thank you again!). I opted 
for the -relabel(3 "':di char(160)'"...) solution. So I was not saying 
your solution did not work. What I tried, but failed, to convey in my 
previous note was this: before I posted my question, I had tried 
-relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")-, which had not worked. You warned in your 
reply that it would not work. I was merely curious to know why 
-relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")- did not work; having read the Graphics 
manual, I felt it should have worked... Anyway, I understood you first 
time and thank you. Have a great Sunday. ---Hiroshi



> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:02:37 -0500
> From: "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: st: Thanks => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar
>
> "Didn't work" is less than informative.  The solution as provided does work.
> At the risk of violating the norms on reposting, I will repeat:
>
> The addition of
>   relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")
> as a suboption of over() ** doesn't ** work.  But this does:
>   relabel(3 "`: di char(160)'" 6 "`: di char(160)'" 9 "`: di char(160)'")
>
> On 3/4/06, Hiroshi Maeda <hmaeda1@uic.edu> wrote:
> > Thank you for your help, Drs. Nichols & Cox; you have solved my
> > problems. Austin, I actually tried the -relabel- suboption inside -over-
> > but it did not work, as you pointed out. I wonder why. I feel the
> > -relabel- suboption should have solved my problem #2. Am I missing
> > something or is this a problem in Stata? ---Hiroshi

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/