Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: ordered probit with random effects


From   "Guillaume Frechette" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   RE: st: ordered probit with random effects
Date   Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:09:20 +0000

Once again I was beat to answering the first... But thanks guys.

g

From: "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: st: ordered probit with random effects
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:45:38 -0000

As often pointed out on this list, "doesn't [...] work"
conveys no precise information.

As I understand it, -reoprob- is not on SSC,
so -ssc- cannot install it. Nor is it
an official Stata command, so Stata
will not recognise the command unless
it is installed.

You must install the -reoprob- files from the STB-61
files on the Stata website. Type

findit reoprob

and within the window that will open
click on

sg158.1

and then click to install.

Nick
[email protected]

Roys Nicolas

> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> in fact, the problem is even more basic.
> Stata9 doesn't recognize the command : reoprob
> so i try to install it (ssc install reoprob) but that doesn't
> work either.

Joseph Coveney

> Roys Nicolas wrote:
>
> I want to estimate an ordered probit with random effects. I
> use Stata9 but
> the command reoprob doesn't seem to work. Could smbdy give me
> the right
> procedure to use ? (i find little guidance in previous post
> nor in google).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
>
> -reoprob- is suitable for random effects ordered probit
> regression.  Could
> you be a little more specific about your problem?
>
> Try the little do-file below.  It converges by the fourth
> iteration (null
> model and full model each--about half a minute to one minute
> in total) and
> should for you, too.  If it does, then something is might
> wrong with the way
> you set up your analysis (or you're not being patient enough for your
> dataset).  If it doesn't, then something might be wrong
> elsewhere:  is
> everything up-to-date (official ado files, -reoprob-,
> executable)?  It
> should give you some diagnostic information either way.
>
> Joseph Coveney
>
> clear
> set more off
> drawnorm latent0 latent1 latent2, ///
>   corr(1 0.5 0.5 \ 0.5 1 0.5 \ 0.5 0.5 1) ///
>   n(200) seed(`=date("2006-02-14", "ymd")')
> generate float predictor = uniform()
> generate int row = _n
> reshape long latent, i(row) j(time)
> generate byte manifest = 1
> forvalues cut = 0.2(0.2)0.8 {
>     replace manifest = manifest + (norm(latent) > `cut')
> }
> xi: reoprob manifest i.time*predictor, i(row)
> exit
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index