[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Jun Xu" <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit |

Date |
Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:13:36 -0500 |

An additional note that applies to all nonlinear models:

E(g(x)) != g(E(x)) [the expectation of a nonlinear function of random variable is not equation to the function of the expectation of random variables

I think what you did with predict is E(g(x)), and what prvalue does is g(E(x))

Jun Xu

Ph.D. Candidate

Department of Sociology

Indiana University at Bloomington

From: "Little, Allan" <[email protected]>_________________________________________________________________

Reply-To: [email protected]

To: <[email protected]>

Subject: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit

Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:10:36 +0100

Dear all,

I'm trying to calculate predicted probabilities following a multinomial logit regression. My dependant variable has three states - employment (coded 0), unemployment (1) and inactivity (2).

I would like to calculate the predicted probability, firstly evaluated at the mean, and secondly evaluated a number of different specified values. However, I am encountering some apparent inconsistencies according to which command I use.

1. If I use 'predict p0 p1 p2 if e(sample)' [option 'pr' is assumed to be the default]. The predicted probabilities are equivalent to the proportion (sample mean) for each category.

2. If I use the 'prvalue' command, the predicted probabilties are different to the above (for example, the predicted probability of being employed is much higher than the sample proportion of people who are actually employed).

3. Similarly, the value given by 'mfx compute, predict(pr outcome(0))' also gives a predicted probability which is the same as the value from 'prvalue', but different to the 'predict' command.

Could anyone explain the difference between the predicted probabilities given by the prvalue, predict and mfx commands? I believe that the predicted probability (evaluated at the mean values of X) should be equivalent to the sample proportion in each category - am I right?

Thanks for your time,

Allan Little

Lancaster University

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit***From:*"Little, Allan" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Concentration Curve and Index** - Next by Date:
**st: predictive model** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Predicted probabilities after mlogit** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |