[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: RE: Adding a -constraints- option |

Date |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:34:30 -0500 |

At 05:21 PM 3/22/2005 -0600, Scott Merryman wrote:

If anyone else is interested in this neat little command - as far as I can tell, it produces the same coefficients and test statistic that you get from using the -test- command with the -coef- parameter. Its biggest advantage over -test-, at least that I can see, is that it lets you replace the values stored in memory from the unconstrained model with the values from the constrained model. This is very useful for post-estimation commands such as -predict- or -fitstat-.Possibly, Jeroen Weesie's -linest- maybe of use: TITLE linest. Two-stage linear-constrained estimation. DESCRIPTION/AUTHOR(S) linest imposed linear constraints on the last estimation results. This two-stage estimator is asymptotically equivalent to the "true" one-stage constrained estimator.

The "asymptotically equivalent" qualifier is important. Using -linest- is like using a Wald test rather than a likelihood ratio test. I believe what it does is use the parameter estimates from the unconstrained model, along with their variances and covariances, and uses those to compute constrained coefficients. This gives results that tend to be similar, but not identical, to what you would get by computing the estimates in a single step, like you could do when a command supports the -constraints- option. For example, I used -linest- after -gologit-, constraining corresponding coefficients to be equal across equations. This gave results that were very similar, but not exactly identical, to what I got by running -ologit-.

It is a very nice command, especially if, like me, you don't know enough about programming to do anything else. But, when possible, it is better to use the -constraints- option, and to write programs that support the -constraints- option. Only a few Stata commands support the -constraints- option now, but hopefully more will do so in the future.

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

FAX: (574)288-4373

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: [email protected]

WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Adding a -constraints- option***From:*Richard Williams <[email protected]>

**st: RE: Adding a -constraints- option***From:*"Scott Merryman" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Updating ml syntax** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Friedman tests** - Previous by thread:
**st: Problem with my keyboard** - Next by thread:
**st: odds ratios in ordered logit models** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |