Yes.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seb Buechte
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: programming help
So would this work out to look like the following, correct?
1) attach rank vector to X an Y
2) sort X descending
3) sort Y ascending
4) Loop over the elements while Yi is greater than Xi and save the
larger values including its rank to a result matrix
5) sort the result matrix according to the ranks of its elements
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:55:54 +0100, Alexandru Voicu <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Not really. If the ordering is important, you can attach a rank vector
> to result matrix result = rank~X, sort it according to the elements of
> x, then do the whole thing for the second column of the result matrix,
> then resort it with respect to its first column.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seb Buechte
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: programming help
>
> I am wondering: do you need to preserve the order of elements in your
> vector(s)? In that case sorting etc. will not help and the whole
> problem remains more complex...
>
> seb
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:58:17 -0500, MITRA PINAKI (MAR1PXM)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am struggling with the following problem and wondering if I
> > can get any help on this. I have two row vectors, X=(x11, x21, x31,
> > ..., xn1)' and Y=(y11, y21, y31, ..., yn1)' where n=300 (I have 300
> > elements in each of the row vectors). My problem is the following:
> > 1) I need to calculate the largest value of Y and the smallest value
> > of X. 2) If the largest value of Y is grater than the smallest value
> > of X, replace the smallest value of X by the largest value of Y. 3)
> > At the next step, ignore the previous largest value of Y and find
> > the largest from the rest of the 299 elements of Y. Also for X, find
> > the smallest value of X from the rest of the 299 elements of X and
> > if the largest value of Y is grater than the smallest value of X,
> > replace the
>
> > smallest value of X by the largest value of Y. 4) The loop stops
> > when the largest value of Y from the rest of Y elements is less than
> > equal to the smallest value of X from the rest of X elements. 5)
> > Construct the new X vector (X_NEW) with the new elements of Y after
> > replacement keeping the unchanged elements of X.
> >
> > My problem is that I am not able to construct the loop correctly and
> > getting no where. Thank you for your help.
> >
> > Pinaki
> >
> > _____________________________
> > Pinaki Mitra
> > UPS Capital
> > 35 Glenlake Parkway, NE
> > Atlanta, GA 30345
> > Office: (404) 828-6759; 5-490-6759 (UPS Atlas)
> > Fax: (404) 828-6660
> > Cell: (404) 668-6575
> > Web: www.upscapital.com
> >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
> --
> - Seb F Buechte
> -
> - Stay in touch!
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
- Seb F Buechte
-
- Stay tuned!
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
