[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Marcela Perticara" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: Re: Extensions to: Creating variables recording properties of the other members of a group |

Date |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:08:56 -0500 |

Hello Guillermo, This code might help. I only tested with the two cases you sent, it might need some adjutment. Here I am creating only one vble for the number of kids, but you can easily rename the variable to be father-mother specific and you will get two vbles after you merge everything. If your dataset is too big you might want to read the data twice instead of preserving/restoring. /*Make datasets for fathers and mothers with their number of kids*/ use hm.dta, clear /*your dataset*/ foreach var of varlist fatherm motherm { preserve qui keep if `var'!=. sort hhid `var' by hhid `var': gen sibl=_N /*here you can make the name father-mother specific*/ by hhid `var': keep if _n==1 keep hhid `var' sibl ren `var' member sort hhid member save `var'.dta, replace restore } use hm.dta sort hhid member merge hhid member using fatherm drop _merge sort hhid member merge hhid member using motherm, update drop _merge I didn�t put too much effort in writting it short, you might be able to shorten it. Hope this helps! Marcela -------------------------------------------- Universidad Alberto Hurtado Erasmo Escala 1835 Santiago, Chile Phono: 671-7130 anexo 267 ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:19 PM Subject: st: Extensions to: Creating variables recording properties of the other members of a group > When working with twin household/individual datasets, this is one of the most > useful FAQs: > http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/data/members.html > However, there are a few issues I couldn't solve with the information included > there, or not efficiently at least. I would like to solve my problem and, if > worthwhile, write an extension of the FAQ. The problem refers to the fact that > sometimes you may need to record for one individual the properties not of the > whole group, but of another member of the group in particular. > In my example, I have a household survey where I don't have direct information > about the number of kids of each individual, but I have something like this: > hhid and member are just the household id and number of member. Variables > fatherm and motherm tell you the number of the member of the father and the > mother, if in the household: > hhid member fatherm motherm > 1 1 - - > 1 2 - - > 1 3 1 2 > 1 4 1 2 > 1 5 1 2 > > 2 1 - - > 2 2 - 1 > 2 3 - 2 > ... > Family one is a couple with three kids. Family two is a grandma, the daughter, > and a grandchild. > I want to create the variable ownkids that gives me the number of own kids > living in the house: > hhid member ownkids > 1 1 3 > 1 2 3 > 1 3 0 > 1 4 0 > 1 5 0 > > 2 1 1 > 2 2 1 > 2 3 0 > > My force brute solution, which makes a lot of unnecessary comparisons and takes > very long (because I generate and drop many variables) is of the form: with > maxmem being the number of members of each household (group i, max is the number > of groups), > forvalues i = 1/`max' { > qui sum member if group==`i' > local maxmem=r(max) forvalues j = 1/`maxmem' { > di "-----------Household number `i', number of members: `maxmem'" > forvalues k = 1/`maxmem' { > di "Household `i', member `j', comparing with `k'" > qui gen a=motherm==`j' if member==`k'&group==`i' > qui egen b=max(a) > qui replace mkids=mkids+b if member==`j'&group==`i' > drop a b > qui gen a=fatherm==`j' if member==`k'&group==`i' > qui egen b=max(a) > qui replace fkids=fkids+b if member==`j'&group==`i' > drop a b > } > } > } > > This creates two variables, mkids and fkids, which are the number of kids for > mothers and fathers. For each member of the household, I compare if . The egen, > replace, drop, takes very long, and even longer if the dataset in memory is > large (I had to partition the dataset in 25 parts to make this run faster). > The main problem (the main awkwardness in this program) is that I gen, egen, > etc. because I could not just create a scalar that reflects the value of a > variable for one precise observation, something of the form (which of course > doesn't work): > local a=mother==`j' if member==`k'&group==`i' (meaning: mother etc. should > refer to the observation: member==`k'&group==`i') > I coudn't use something like motherm[_...] becauseI was not using by: ... . > What I would like to know if there are more efficient ways of doing this (I'm > sure there are!). > > Thank you all > > *************************** > Guillermo Cruces > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ ______________________________________ Universidad Alberto Hurtado http://www.uahurtado.cl * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**st: Problems with psmatch 2** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: StataQuest** - Previous by thread:
**st: Extensions to: Creating variables recording properties of the other membersof a group** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: Extensions to: Creating variables recording properties of the other members of a group** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |