Marcello Pagano <[email protected]> writes:
> In my opinion this is terrible. A missing value
> is a missing value is a missing value, and should
> remain so.
I've been convinced that this is the better interpretation of missing
for -egen, cut-. Missing values will be mapped to missing; non
missing values larger than that of the largest value in -at- will map
to the largest value in the -at- list.
Expect to see this in the next ado update.
--Jean Marie
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
