Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: -save- a varlist
Nick Cox <email@example.com>
Re: st: -save- a varlist
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:54:13 +0000
This seems contradictory to me. I can e.g. -outsheet- a variable as
value labels and -label save- too. So, you can read the data back in
and then -encode- them. I would rather not do that, sure, but it's not
especially difficult and it could certainly be automated via
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jeph Herrin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the various tips, this last one (-label save-, which I have used
> in other contexts, but forgot about) being the most useful.
> Regarding the other comments:
> * -outsheet- and -outfile- are obvious alternatives that don't really
> solve the problem, in that labels are still lost
> * unless of course I do it twice, once with and without value labels,
> as suggested, but it's not trivial to recreate value labels that way
> with the same underlying values
> * per Austin's question, I can derive variables and save those
> locally; I have many types of nested units, so generally I am
> creating summary values for these different units (eg, patients,
> physicians, hospitals) and want to save them out in separate files
> for each type of unit. and there are some original variables (that I
> didn't create) which I can also save locally because there is no
> identifying data.
> On 10/30/2012 10:23 AM, Nick Cox wrote:
>> Note also -label save-.
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Austin Nichols <email@example.com>
>>> Jeph Herrin <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>>> And if you do that twice, the -nolabel- option can be used one of
>>> those times, so you have both values and value labels. But why can't
>>> you save the whole file locally, if you are allowed to save several
>>> variables locally?
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Nick Cox <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> As Daniel Feenberg underlined recently, you can -outsheet- part of the
>>>> data. In the same vein, -outfile- is another alternative.
>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jeph Herrin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>> I have a very large dataset (20gb) that I must access remotely, so that
>>>>> -use- and -save- each take about 30minutes. When I have this file open,
>>>>> I would like to create some secondary files that contain only 1-3
>>>>> If the file were smaller, I would typically use -preserve-, -keep-,
>>>>> -save-, -restore- to do this. However, this takes a couple of hours. So
>>>>> I am using
>>>>> . export excel var1 var2 var3 using file.xls, replace
>>>>> Then later using -import excel- to read them back in. This is much
>>>>> faster, but has the obvious drawback that variable labels and other
>>>>> attributes are lost. It is also aesthetically unsatisfying.
>>>>> Can anyone suggest an alternative?
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try: