Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Estout: suppressing significance stars on constant term


From   Carsten Sauer <carsten.sauer@uni-bielefeld.de>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Estout: suppressing significance stars on constant term
Date   Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:28:05 +0200

You could use the stardrop option:

sysuse auto
reg price weight length
esttab, stardrop(_cons)

Best, Carsten

Am 05.09.2012 01:57, schrieb Bert Lloyd:
Dear statalist,

When using estout (or its wrapper esttab), is there a simple way to
suppress significance stars for the constant term only?

The reason I ask is that when the intercept represents a "base"
category and the regression is measuring differences from this base,
testing _b[intercept]=0 isn't all that meaningful.

Many thanks in advance,

BL

PS - using estout version 3.13, from net describe st0085_1,
from(http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj7-2), on Stata 12.1 for
Windows.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

--

Carsten Sauer
SFB 882 "Von Heterogenitäten zu Ungleichheiten"
Teilprojekt A6 "Die Legitimation von Ungleichheiten - Strukturelle Bedingungen von Gerechtigkeitseinstellungen"
Fakultät für Soziologie
Universität Bielefeld
Postfach 10 01 31
33501 Bielefeld
Tel.: 0521 106-70056/-6948 (Sekr. Frau Fischer)
Fax: 0521 106-6479

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index