Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: missing values


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: missing values
Date   Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:25:11 +0100

Even people expert in this area would be likely to appreciate a
reminder of what equation 3 in Kidd and Shannon 1996 is -- and indeed
a full reference as expected on this list.

You seem to be expecting that people will find the paper, re-read it
and then think about your question.

Exactly the same point was made to you a matter of days ago.

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-03/msg00824.html

Nick

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com> wrote:

> i want to calculate the decomposition(eq 3) in the paper of Kidd and
> Shannon, 1996,does the level of occupational aggregation affect the
> estimates of the gender wage gap?
> I have all the ingredients but i don't get the total gap by my
> computations.is this because for some of the components i have missing
> values. For example the prop of men in occupation 1 is missing for
> women and indiv in other occupations. Well, if instead of missing i
> replace 0 the result is not the expected one. Do i have to gen, for my
> example a  variable, or better a scalar that takes the same value even
> if it is a men in other occupations?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index